The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Opinion K Street is terrible. The D.C. Council should finally fix it.

Office space for lease at 1990 K Street NW, one of many buildings in downtown D.C. with vacancies. (Heather Long/The Washington Post)
4 min

One of D.C.’s foremost contributions to cumbersome design is the presence of the service lanes on either side of K Street NW in the heart of downtown. You know — those narrow spaces where delivery trucks stop traffic, where pedestrians venture at great risk and where horn-honking and middle-finger brandishing have become the lingua franca of urban immobility.

The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) has been working for years on a plan to eliminate these oases of dysfunction as well as to upgrade the entire corridor between 12th and 21st Streets NW. The sweeping makeover is critical to the revival of a downtown that’s still sputtering through its post-covid hangover, with office occupancy stuck at around half of its pre-pandemic levels. Yet the whole project is now in peril, with the D.C. Council, as part of its deliberations over the city’s fiscal 2024 budget, weighing a plan to strip funding for what’s known as the K Street Transitway in favor of other priorities.

We say: No way. It’s time for the District to exploit the grandeur of its broad byways. K Street has long served as a passing-through point for motorists riding to and from Virginia and for office workers walking to and from their medical appointments. How about a K Street worth slowing down for?

Urban overhauls typically proceed at their own leisure, and the K Street project is no exception. An environmental assessment dates back to 2009. A decade later, Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) championed the roughly $120 million project and DDOT spent recent years balancing the interest of the corridor’s stakeholders. Last December, the agency presented what it called the “final” plan. It called for two protected bus lanes to facilitate east-west transit, capacious median platforms with bus stops, bike lanes in each direction, two lanes on each side of the street for vehicle traffic and a whole bunch of landscape improvements, including a boost in the number of trees.

The idea, DDOT said in the presentation, was to create a “great street.”

Follow Editorial Board's opinions

This “great street,” however, was designed with moving goal posts. Even though DDOT declared the blueprint “final” late last year, the authorities recently booted the bike lanes from the project and beefed up the bike-lane offerings a block to the north on L Street NW. City Administrator Kevin Donahue told us that the bike-lane subtraction came at the request of two business improvement districts (BIDs) — Golden Triangle and Downtown — to accommodate loading and drop-off and pickup zones. (The BIDs issued a joint statement to us saying they’re working with DDOT toward “a vision for K Street that responds to the needs of the curb usage for this vital corridor while providing a safe travel corridor for residents, businesses and visitors.”)

Ward 6 D.C. Council member Charles Allen (D), who chairs the council committee on transportation and the environment, balked at the changes. “They have engineered every part of a livable, walkable street out of it,” Allen told us, arguing that the current blueprint is a throwback to auto-obsessed planning.

Along with Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D), Mr. Allen favors shifting funding for the transit way to a program for eliminating fares on Metrobus trips in D.C. — an idea that appears to rest in dry dock after a skeptical recent letter from Metro’s board of directors. But Mr. Allen sees other destinations for the transit-way funds, including road safety and transit-improvement ideas as well as the restoration of the D.C. Circulator bus routes that Ms. Bowser has proposed cutting. “We can make that investment right now and take the time to get K Street done right,” Mr. Allen said.

Skip to end of carousel
  • The Biden administration releases a review on the Colorado River.
  • The misery of Belarus’s political prisoners should not be ignored.
  • Biden has a new border plan.
  • The United States should keep the pressure on Nicaragua.
  • America’s fight against inflation isn’t over.
  • The Taliban has doubled down on the repression of women.
The Biden administration released an environmental impact statement outlining options for cutting use of the Colorado River. Water allocations could prioritize farmers in California based on centuries-old water rights, or involve proportional cuts to Arizona, California and Nevada. The review also included the costs of the status quo.
The administration will likely decide on a course of action by August. As we outlined in an editorial in February, a voluntary agreement between the states is the best option — and a dramatic reimagining of water use is needed thereafter.
Ihar Losik, one of hundreds of young people unjustly jailed in Belarus for opposing Alexander Lukashenko’s dictatorship, attempted suicide but was saved and sent to a prison medical unit, according to the human rights group Viasna. Losik, 30, a blogger who led a popular Telegram channel, was arrested in 2020 and is serving a 15-year prison term on charges of “organizing riots” and “incitement to hatred.” His wife is also a political prisoner. Read more about their struggle — and those of other political prisoners — in a recent editorial.
The Department of Homeland Security has provided details of a plan to prevent a migrant surge along the southern border. The administration would presumptively deny asylum to migrants who failed to seek it in a third country en route — unless they face “an extreme and imminent threat” of rape, kidnapping, torture or murder. Critics allege that this is akin to an illegal Trump-era policy. In fact, President Biden is acting lawfully in response to what was fast becoming an unmanageable flow at the border. Read our most recent editorial on the U.S. asylum system.
Some 222 Nicaraguan political prisoners left that Central American country for the United States in February. President Daniel Ortega released and sent them into exile in a single motion. Nevertheless, it appears that Mr. Ortega let them go under pressure from economic sanctions the United States imposed on his regime when he launched a wave of repression in 2018. The Biden administration should keep the pressure on. Read recent editorials about the situation in Nicaragua.
Inflation remains stubbornly high at 6.4 percent in January. The Federal Reserve’s job is not done in this fight. More interest rate hikes are needed. Read a recent editorial about inflation and the Fed.
Afghanistan’s rulers had promised that barring women from universities was only temporary. But private universities got a letter on Jan. 28 warning them that women are prohibited from taking university entrance examinations. Afghanistan has 140 private universities across 24 provinces, with around 200,000 students. Out of those, some 60,000 to 70,000 are women, the AP reports. Read a recent editorial on women’s rights in Afghanistan.

1/7

End of carousel

That’s not a realistic scenario, said Mr. Donahue. “If it’s not funded, it’s done forever,” said the city administrator, noting that construction costs will mount and it will be a “long time before there is space in the capital budget to be able to afford it.” What’s more, Mr. Donahue said a visual from Ms. Bowser’s Twitter account of the K Street redesign featuring seven auto lanes (five moving lanes and two for parking) was inaccurate; that visual triggered mockery on social media.

The takeaway here is layered. Mr. Allen is correct to blast DDOT for the car-centric design; the council would be right to push for changes in its upcoming budget votes. Any decision that imperils the transit way, however, is shortsighted. Vibrant cities correct their infrastructural mistakes, and K Street is a doozy in that department. “If we don’t make investments for downtown right now,” said Ward 2 D.C. Council member Brooke Pinto (D), “then we will suffer as a downtown and as an entire city for years to come.”

The Post’s View | About the Editorial Board

Editorials represent the views of The Post as an institution, as determined through debate among members of the Editorial Board, based in the Opinions section and separate from the newsroom.

Members of the Editorial Board and areas of focus: Opinion Editor David Shipley; Deputy Opinion Editor Karen Tumulty; Associate Opinion Editor Stephen Stromberg (national politics and policy); Lee Hockstader (European affairs, based in Paris); David E. Hoffman (global public health); James Hohmann (domestic policy and electoral politics, including the White House, Congress and governors); Charles Lane (foreign affairs, national security, international economics); Heather Long (economics); Associate Editor Ruth Marcus; Mili Mitra (public policy solutions and audience development); Keith B. Richburg (foreign affairs); and Molly Roberts (technology and society).

Loading...