As the Biden administration races to investigate a leak of classified U.S. documents, much of Washington is remaining silent about a particularly sensitive disclosure within the trove of files: an alleged revolt by Israel’s top spy service against the judicial overhaul proposed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
By itself, the direct intervention into Israeli politics by the Mossad, an external spy service forbidden from wading into domestic matters, would be a significant revelation. That the information surfaced as a result, apparently, of U.S. espionage on its closest Middle East ally could further inflame what has been a time of historic political unrest in Israel.
“If accurate, this is dramatic change in procedure by Mossad’s leadership and puts Israel in unprecedented territory,” said Natan Sachs, an Israel scholar at the Brookings Institution. “It’s a sign of just how far the Netanyahu coalition has pushed Israeli society and how high the stakes are.”
On Sunday, the prime minister’s office released a statement on behalf of the Mossad, describing media reports about the memo as “mendacious and without any foundation whatsoever.”
“The Mossad and its serving senior personnel have not engaged in the issue of the demonstrations at all and are dedicated to the value of service to the state that has guided the Mossad since its founding,” the statement read.
The memo is among the dozens of images leaked online, and subsequently obtained by The Washington Post and other news outlets, appearing to show worldwide intelligence briefings on countries in the Middle East, Europe, Latin America, Asia and Africa; tactical-level battlefield updates and assessments of Ukraine’s defense capabilities; and much more. Information in the documents, dating to late February and early March, appears to have been prepared for senior Pentagon leaders and made available to hundreds of other personnel and contract employees with appropriate security clearances.
The National Security Council, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the State Department all declined to comment Saturday on the memo related to Israel. Defense Department spokeswoman Sabrina Singh said Friday that the leak is under review. The Justice Department said it has opened an investigation.
The embarrassing disclosure comes at a time of domestic tumult in Israel, as Netanyahu’s government, the most right-wing and religiously conservative in its history, faces crises on multiple fronts. The new administration’s plan to weaken the country’s Supreme Court has divided society, brought hundreds of thousands out onto the streets, and caused fractures in the military by inspiring hundreds of reservists to declare they would not serve. Israeli diplomats joined the strikes and, for a day, scores of Israeli embassies around the world were shuttered.
But, at least in public, opposition came mainly from the grass roots or retired officials, as serving lawmakers and security figures stood supportive or tight-lipped. The only major figure to break ranks, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, himself under pressure from former military colleagues, did so in late March. The following day, Netanyahu announced Gallant was fired, although he still remains in office.
By contrast, the Mossad, whose chief David Barnea was installed by Netanyahu, has been publicly silent on the overhaul. Israeli news media reported in late February that he had given permission for low-ranking Mossad personnel to participate in the demonstrations, on the condition that they did not make their professional affiliations public. The decision came in response to a petition from intelligence officers suggesting that they would not report for duty if the legislation went ahead.
The measures under consideration could have a dramatic impact on Israeli society. Many of the country’s thorniest issues — among them the rights of Palestinians, matters of religion and state, and minority civil rights — end up being adjudicated in Israel’s courts. The proposed overhaul would hand Israel’s parliament control over judicial appointments, eliminate judicial review of legislation and allow lawmakers to vote down Supreme Court decisions.
Despite the high stakes, undermining the agenda of a sitting prime minister would be a dramatic step for the Mossad leadership to take. “If they were organizing against Netanyahu’s reforms in their official capacity, then it’s a true scandal,” Sachs said. “That’s a line the Mossad is not supposed to cross, and you could expect repercussions.”
The memo is light on details, and it is unclear who in the Mossad leadership advocated for rank-and-file spies as well as civilians to “protest” Netanyahu’s plans. Efforts by Mossad leaders to encourage the demonstrations occurred in “early to mid-February,” the leaked document says. The information is labeled FISA, meaning the collection of the intelligence required approval from a federal judge as established under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Washington’s role in exposing the Mossad’s concerns about the overhaul could draw the fire of Israeli conservatives, some of whom have already accused the United States of secretly fomenting the protests — charges Washington flatly denies. Last month, Netanyahu’s son Yair claimed the U.S. State Department was “behind the protests in Israel, with the aim of overthrowing Netanyahu, apparently in order to conclude an agreement with the Iranians.”
State Department spokesman Vedant Patel denied the charge, saying “any notion that we are propping up or supporting these protests or the initiators of them is completely and demonstrably false.”
Sachs said any U.S. espionage role in intercepting the communications of Mossad leaders “could give fodder to some on the right pushing back against the Biden administration’s concern over the judicial revolution.”
The Mossad’s alleged opposition to the judicial overhaul won’t surprise some, however, given the opposition to the measures — or their political impact — within Israel’s national security establishment.
In late March, Gallant, the defense minister, made a televised statement calling for a freeze in the legislation, arguing that it was harming the country’s ability to defend itself. “The rift within our society is widening and penetrating the Israel Defense Forces,” he said. “This is a clear and immediate and tangible danger to the security of the state. I shall not be a party to this.”
Avi Dichter, the agriculture minister and a former head of the domestic intelligence agency Shin Bet, has also privately expressed concerns about its impact on national cohesion, Israeli news station Channel 12 reported.
As protesters announced rallies Saturday for a 14th consecutive week, former defense minister and IDF chief of staff Moshe Ya’alon was among the announced speakers.
“The Israeli government has failed in every area,” protest leaders wrote in a message circulated via WhatsApp, “and instead of focusing on security, senior ministers announced their intention to pass the judicial coup at the end of the Knesset recess.”
Loveluck reported from Jerusalem. Dalton Bennett, Evan Hill and Samuel Oakford in Washington contributed to this report.
This article was updated to include a statement from the Israeli prime minister’s office that was issued after publication.